ntoskrnl
gehört zum Inventar
leider lässt danach die Systemleistung Extrem nach, wenn danach das starten eines Programms oder Videos ewig lange dauert.
So generell kann man das nicht sagen. In dem von mir verlinkten Artikel hat das jemand gemessen:
I made a test on my i7 SATA II drive.
Using Apptimer to measure application launch time I NTFS compressed Mozilla Firefox folder and it ran slightly faster when compressed (4,7s vs 5.0).
I defragmented the folder and rebooted the pc before any iteration of the test.
On a slower machine (w7, Phenom 1), MS Office 2010 x64 went unfortunately from 2,56s to 3,41s loading time.
I think NTFS compression Cons overweight the Pros, that is, you incur in some cpu penalty hits and you suffer from terrible fragmentation when writing/modifying. And don't you ever do this on an SSD drive. You will wear out the drive and shorten its lifespam.
Hello. I have made a small benchmark regarding loading times and the different options.
I used MS Office 2010 Word x64
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\WINWORD.EXE - Uncompressed: 5.1257 seconds loading time
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\WINWORD.EXE - LZX: 4.0160 seconds loading time
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\WINWORD.EXE - Xpress4K: 2.9703 seconds loading time
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\WINWORD.EXE - Xpress8K: 2.6571 seconds loading time
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office14\WINWORD.EXE - Xpress16k: 2.5630 seconds loading time
It seems my i7 is pretty happy decompressing xpress16k.
MOZILLA FIREFOX 41.0.2
Size on Disk Compression Ratio Loading Time
====================================================
Uncompressed 85.2 MB (1.0 to 1) 5.2817s
NTLZ1 64.8 MB (1.3 to 1) 4.6882s
Xpress4K 59.0 MB (1.4 to 1) 4.9851s
Xpress8K 56.5 MB (1.5 to 1) 4.9538s
Xpress16K 55.2 MB (1.5 to 1) 5.1729s
LZX 49.3 MB (1.7 to 1) 5.6415s